Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Oceania MAX 2001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 Oceania MAX 2001[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

also nominating:

another useless sprawling series of sports results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. no evidence of long term notability after 10 years. LibStar (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all fail WP:GNG, insignificant coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all These are some of the biggest and most historically significant events ever held in kickboxing. Many of them feature Grand Prixs which determine the best fighters in the region, and which allows them qualify for the World GP at the end of the year. Some of these events even featured world title fights (in both kickboxing and professional boxing) - Minowafan (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

none of these are world title fights. Please provide evidence of significant coverage as per WP:PERSISTENCE to support your claim of historical notability. LibStar (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 15:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Only the Oceania event was a qualifying event. The others were, at best, qualifying events for qualifying events, and some weren't even that. All appear to be just routine sports coverage. Papaursa (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Articles are routine sports reporting about non-notable events and without reliable sources. Astudent0 (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Massive consensus that this is nonnotable, routine sports coverage. Neutrality^talk 01:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.